BETA
This is a BETA experience. You may opt-out by clicking here

More From Forbes

Edit Story

Medtronic To Pay Over $1Billion To Settle Patent Litigation With Edwards Lifesciences

Following
This article is more than 9 years old.

After years of protracted and often bitter litigation in the US and abroad, Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic today announced a broad resolution to all their patent disputes over transcatheter heart valves.

Medtronic will pay more than a billion dollars over the course of the agreement, which lasts until April 2022. Edwards will first receive a one-time payment of $750 million, followed by ongoing royalty payments until April 2022 based on a percentage of Medtronic's CoreValve sales. These payments will range between $40 and $60 million each year of the agreement. The two companies also agreed that they would not sue each other over transcatheter heart valves patents for the next 8 years.

Medtronic released the following statement from John Liddicoat, president of the company's Structural Heart business: "This agreement brings to an end years of disputes between our companies related to TAVI patents, and allows both companies to make their respective therapies available to physicians and patients around the world. With this resolution, we are pleased that Medtronic will be able to continue to provide the CoreValve System, as well as other products, to patients who need them in the US and abroad without the overhang of any potential injunction or additional damages."

Edwards released the following statement from its chairman and CEO, Michael A. Mussallem: "We are pleased to reach an agreement that preserves physician choice while also recognizing Edwards' leadership in pioneering the transcatheter heart valves that are chosen most often by physicians worldwide. This agreement allows us to move forward, fully dedicating our time and resources to helping patients."

The agreement comes a little more than a month after Edwards achieved a sweeping victory in the courts over Medtronic which could have severely limited the availability of CoreValve in the US. Although the implementation of the injunction was postponed on appeal, the decision appears to have prompted the two companies to enter into serious negotiations. Although the Edwards legal victory was clear, the company, as I wrote at the time, was in danger of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory by alienating its core customers by limiting the availability of CoreValve in the US.