CardioNet Sues InfoBionic
| Printer friendly version
On May 8, 2015 CardioNet, LLC and Braemar Manufacturing, LLC sued InfoBionic in the United States District Court, District of Massachusetts. The lawsuit alleges that InfoBionic’s MoMe® Kardia System infringes four of Braemar’s patents that are exclusively licensed to CardioNet:
- U.S. Patent No. 6,225,901, entitled “Reprogrammable remote sensor monitoring system,” which issued on May 1, 2001;
- U.S. Patent No. 6,940,403, entitled “Reprogrammable remote sensor monitoring system,” which issued on September 6, 2005;
- U.S. Patent No. 7,212,850, entitled “System and method for processing and presenting arrhythmia information to facilitate heart arrhythmia identification and treatment,” which issued on May 1, 2007; and
- U.S. Patent No. 7,907,996, entitled “System and method for processing and presenting arrhythmia information to facilitate heart arrhythmia identification and treatment,” which issued on March 15, 2011.
Figure 2 from the ‘996 Patent is shown below.
CardioNet has asserted the ‘850 and ‘996 Patents against other parties in two other lawsuits, which were both instituted on May 8, 2012. CardioNet, Inc. v. MedNet Healthcare Technologies, Inc. et al was settled by the parties in January 2014 and CardioNet, Inc. v. The Scottcare Corporation et al remains pending.
Related
By using this blog, you agree and understand that no information is being provided in the context of any attorney-client relationship. You further agree and understand that nothing herein is intended to be legal advice. This blog is solely informational in nature, and is not intended as, and should not be used as, a substitute for competent legal advice from a retained and licensed attorney in your state. Knobbe Martens LLP makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the information in this blog. Knobbe Martens LLP will not be liable for any injury or damages relating to your use of, or access to, any such information. Knobbe Martens LLP undertakes no obligation to correct or update information on this blog, which may be incorrect or become incorrect or out of date over time. Knobbe Martens LLP reserves the right to alter or delete content or information on the blog at any time. This blog contains links and references to other websites and publications that you may find of interest. Knobbe Martens LLP does not control, promote, endorse or otherwise have any affiliation with any other websites or publications unless those websites or publications expressly state such an affiliation. Knobbe Martens LLP further has no responsibility for, and makes no representations regarding, the content, accuracy or any other aspect of the information in such websites or publications.
Share