District Court Awarded Ultrasound Device Maker Verasonics $5.6 Million And World-Wide Injunction In Trade Secret Case

The United States District Court of Western District of Washington entered a judgment in a trade secret case, Verasonics, Inc. v. Alpinion Medical Systems Co., Ltd. (Case No. 2:14-cv-01820-JCC). The district court confirmed the final arbitration award, giving Plaintiff Verasonics, Inc. $5.6 million in damages, including fees and costs, and enjoining Defendant Alpinion Medical Systems Co., Ltd. from using Verasonics’ trade secret, including marketing or selling any devices using the trade secret for five years.

Verasonics, Inc. describes itself as a Kirkland, Washington-based company that specializes in ultrasound devices and technology.  In the complaint filed on November 26, 2014, Verasonics alleged that Alpinion, headquartered in Seoul, South Korea, showed interest in “licensing, co-development or investment” opportunities with Verasonics starting from 2010.  Alpinion allegedly “induced” Verasonics into revealing its trade secrets and confidential information to Alpinion as the two parties entered into a series of Non-Disclosure Agreements (“NDAs”), and lease agreements for Alpinion to lease two research ultrasound systems from Verasonics.  The complaint also alleged that Alpinion made a below-market offer to Verasonics, which was rejected, and that Alpinion represented that its interest was in commercial ultrasound products, not in research ultrasound devices.

However, Alpinion later announced its own eCube-12R ultrasound platform specifically designed for the research market.  Verasonics sued Alpinion for trade secret misappropriation under the Washington State Uniform Trade Secret Act in addition to breach of contract claims in the Western District of Washington.

In 2015, the case at the district court was stayed pending a binding arbitration at the American Arbitration Association (case name ICDR No. 01-15-0002-9484).  The arbitrator found that Alpinion breached the parties’ NDAs and lease agreement, and violoated the Washington Uniform Trade Secret Act.  The arbitrator issued a partial final arbitration award of $2.9 million in compensatory damages and a five-year injunction against Alpinion on March 2, 2017.  The partial arbitration award was filed under seal and not publicly available.  According to Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, the law firm representing Verasonics in this matter, the injunction against marketing and sales of the accused product is worldwide.  The arbitrator subsequently issued a final award on June 26, 2017, ordering Alpinion to pay Verasonics another $2.7 million in attorneys’ and arbitration fees and other expenses.

According to a press release made after the partial final award, Lauren Pflugrath, president and CEO of Verasonics, said:

We are grateful for the arbitrator’s decision to issue the Final Award so clearly in our favor.  We continue to expand and build positive collaborative partnerships, but must insist on protecting our intellectual property.

Sabrina Wang
Sabrina Wang is an associate in our Orange County office. Ms. Wang received her Bachelor's Degree in Bioengineering in 2007 from National University of Singapore. After graduation, she worked as an engineer developing orthopedic devices in Utah and Singapore. In 2015, Ms. Wang graduated from the University of Virginia School of Law. While attending law school, Ms. Wang served on the Article Review Board of Virginia Journal of Law & Technology in her second year. Ms. Wang was a summer associate at the firm in 2014 and joined the firm as an associate in 2015.
Click here to read full bio
View all posts published by Sabrina Wang »

Leave a Reply

By using this blog, you agree and understand that no information is being provided in the context of any attorney-client relationship. You further agree and understand that nothing herein is intended to be legal advice. This blog is solely informational in nature, and is not intended as, and should not be used as, a substitute for competent legal advice from a retained and licensed attorney in your state. Knobbe Martens LLP makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the information in this blog. Knobbe Martens LLP will not be liable for any injury or damages relating to your use of, or access to, any such information. Knobbe Martens LLP undertakes no obligation to correct or update information on this blog, which may be incorrect or become incorrect or out of date over time. Knobbe Martens LLP reserves the right to alter or delete content or information on the blog at any time. This blog contains links and references to other websites and publications that you may find of interest. Knobbe Martens LLP does not control, promote, endorse or otherwise have any affiliation with any other websites or publications unless those websites or publications expressly state such an affiliation. Knobbe Martens LLP further has no responsibility for, and makes no representations regarding, the content, accuracy or any other aspect of the information in such websites or publications.