Medtronic Settles Federal Lawsuit for $4.41 Million

| Printer friendly version

On April 2, 2015, the United States Department of Justice announced that Medtronic, a medical device manufacturer based in Ireland, reached a settlement agreement with the United States government for $4.41 million over allegations that Medtronic had violated the Trade Agreements Act of 1979.  The Trade Agreements Act requires that products sold to the U.S. government originate in the United States or in a country that has signed an international trade agreement with the United States.

According to the press release, the government alleged that Medtronic made false statements regarding the origin of medical devices sold to the United States that had originated in China and Malaysia, prohibited countries under the Trade Agreements Act.  The specific devices at issue were related to cardiac treatment and spinal surgery.

The Star Tribune quoted Medtronic spokeswoman Cindy Resman as stating that Medtronic “makes no admission that any of its activities were improper or unlawful.”

Brian Flynn
Brian Flynn focuses on patent preparation and litigation. He counsels clients in a wide variety of technologies, including: · Medical Device: medical and dental instruments, implants, diagnostic equipment, and communication and data systems · Mechanical: automotive technology, sporting goods, kitchen appliances, beverage containers, and toys · Electronics: digital camera technology, mobile devices, GPS devices, and sensor technology Brian received his law degree from the University of Illinois College of Law, where he served as the Secretary for the Intellectual Property Legal Society and as an Articles Editor for the Journal of Law, Technology & Policy. Prior to his legal education, he received a Bachelor's Degree in Bioengineering from the University of Illinois.
Click here to read full bio
View all posts published by Brian Flynn »

Leave a Reply

By using this blog, you agree and understand that no information is being provided in the context of any attorney-client relationship. You further agree and understand that nothing herein is intended to be legal advice. This blog is solely informational in nature, and is not intended as, and should not be used as, a substitute for competent legal advice from a retained and licensed attorney in your state. Knobbe Martens LLP makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the information in this blog. Knobbe Martens LLP will not be liable for any injury or damages relating to your use of, or access to, any such information. Knobbe Martens LLP undertakes no obligation to correct or update information on this blog, which may be incorrect or become incorrect or out of date over time. Knobbe Martens LLP reserves the right to alter or delete content or information on the blog at any time. This blog contains links and references to other websites and publications that you may find of interest. Knobbe Martens LLP does not control, promote, endorse or otherwise have any affiliation with any other websites or publications unless those websites or publications expressly state such an affiliation. Knobbe Martens LLP further has no responsibility for, and makes no representations regarding, the content, accuracy or any other aspect of the information in such websites or publications.