Skip to content

FTC’s Proposed Noncompete Ban in Doubt

 | 

On April 23, 2024, the United States Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), via a 3-2 vote, issued a final rule, which, according to the FTC’s rule summary, provides a comprehensive ban on new noncompetes nationwide and bans existing noncompetes with workers other than senior executives.  The rule is scheduled to go into effect September 4, 2024.  However, a federal judge in Texas temporarily halted the implementation and enforcement of the FTC rule and stayed the September 4 start date, at least with respect to the specific plaintiffs involved in a lawsuit that challenged the FTC rule, Ryan, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission Case (No. 3:24-cv-00986).

The district court judge, Ada Brown, indicated that she intends to rule on whether the ban on the FTC rule should be applied nationwide by August 30, 2024.

In response to the ruling, FTC spokesperson Douglas Farrar said, “[t]he FTC stands by our clear authority, supported by statute and precedent, to issue this rule. We will keep fighting to free hardworking Americans from unlawful noncompetes, which reduce innovation, inhibit economic growth, trap workers, and undermine Americans’ economic liberty.”

In the FTC’s official press release announcing the rule banning noncompetes, the FTC estimated that 1 in 5 US workers are subject to a noncompete agreement.  Many commentators believe that the FTC’s proposed ban on noncompete agreements could have a big impact on the health care industry.

“Noncompete clauses keep wages low, suppress new ideas, and rob the American economy of dynamism, including from the more than 8,500 new startups that would be created a year once noncompetes are banned,” said FTC Chair Lina M. Khan. “The FTC’s final rule to ban noncompetes will ensure Americans have the freedom to pursue a new job, start a new business, or bring a new idea to market.”

Although this initial district court ruling does not provide a definitive answer, it does provide a strong indication that the FTC rule will be declared unenforceable.  At least two other lawsuits challenging the FTC’s proposed ban were also filed shortly after the FTC announced its final rule and may provide further insight.

Tags

, ,

FTC’s Proposed Noncompete Ban in Doubt Headshot

Michael Christensen

Michael R. Christensen is a partner in our Orange County office. Mr. Christensen represents clients in the medical device, electronics, media and entertainment, and computer software fields. While he has helped clients protect a variety of technologies, Mr. Christensen focuses on building patent portfolios for medical device clients in the neurovascular, neuromodulation and spine fields.

Mr. Christensen also has extensive experience conducting patent due diligence for leading Venture Capital firms and other investors. He has also performed several IP audits to help companies identify ways to improve their patent portfolio. One of Mr. Christensen’s areas of expertise is developing strategies for expediting patent prosecution both in the United States and abroad. Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Christensen clerked with firms in Seattle, Salt Lake City and Irvine. While pursuing his undergraduate degree in electrical engineering, Mr. Christensen served as a Teaching Assistant in a semiconductor device fabrication lab in addition to taking courses focusing on digital system design and digital communication theory.

Mr. Christensen was a summer associate with the firm in 2007 and he joined the firm as an associate in 2008.

View all posts published by Michael Christensen
By using this blog, you agree and understand that no information is being provided in the context of any attorney-client relationship. You further agree and understand that nothing herein is intended to be legal advice. This blog is solely informational in nature, and is not intended as, and should not be used as, a substitute for competent legal advice from a retained and licensed attorney in your state. Knobbe Martens LLP makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the information in this blog. Knobbe Martens LLP will not be liable for any injury or damages relating to your use of, or access to, any such information. Knobbe Martens LLP undertakes no obligation to correct or update information on this blog, which may be incorrect or become incorrect or out of date over time. Knobbe Martens LLP reserves the right to alter or delete content or information on the blog at any time. This blog contains links and references to other websites and publications that you may find of interest. Knobbe Martens LLP does not control, promote, endorse or otherwise have any affiliation with any other websites or publications unless those websites or publications expressly state such an affiliation. Knobbe Martens LLP further has no responsibility for, and makes no representations regarding, the content, accuracy or any other aspect of the information in such websites or publications.
close modal