Skip to content

Mark Lezama

Mark Lezama is a litigation partner in our Orange County office focusing on patent and technology-related disputes.

Mark represents patent owners and accused infringers alike, in jurisdictions all across the country. He approaches litigation thoughtfully, working with clients to position their cases for meaningful victories. In a contract case involving a patent license, Mark obtained for his client a court-ordered injunction requiring the licensee to honor its agreement and withdraw its challenges to his client’s patents at the Patent and Trademark Office. When the licensee appealed, Mark obtained an affirmance from the Ninth Circuit for his client. In another case, Mark obtained key evidentiary rulings for his client early on, laying the groundwork for the court to rule that his client did not infringe just six months into the case. Mark builds on courtroom successes like these by planning and taking strategic steps out of court for his clients, including pursuing inter partes review by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. He also counsels on patent-portfolio strategy, patent-infringement and validity assessments, and licensing transactions.

Owing to his strong background in mathematics and computer science, Mark’s practice encompasses a wide variety of technologies, including such diverse fields as quantum computing, mobile apps, computer networks, cryptography, optics, medical devices, thermoelectrics, internal-combustion engines, and surf systems for sport boats.

Mark is currently serving as a lawyer representative to the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference and as a member of the Local Rules Advisory Committee for the Central District of California. Mark’s connection to the Central District dates back to his first summer as a law student, when he externed for the Honorable Rosalyn M. Chapman.

Mark chairs the firm’s Diversity Committee and is a past President and board member of the Orange County Coalition for Diversity in the Law. He has also served as a mentor with the Foundation for Advancement of Diversity in IP Law.

 
University of California – Berkeley – School of Law, J.D.
Harvard University, A.B., Mathematics
State Bar of California
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
U.S. District Court – Central District of California
U.S. District Court – Northern District of California
U.S. District Court – Southern District of California
Advertising, Media & Entertainment

Mobile Applications

Online Games

Video Games & Interactive Entertainment

Communications Technology

Wireless Local Area Networks

Electrical, Semiconductor & Computer Technology

Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Electronics & Semiconductors

Software & IT

Fashion & Beauty

Financial Services & Business Methods

Blockchain & Smart Contracts

Cloud Computing

Cryptocurrency & Encryption

Data Privacy

Dispute Resolution

Licensing & Indemnification

Open Source

Medical Devices & Procedures

Transportation & Vehicles

Advertising, Media & Entertainment Practice
Appellate Litigation
Assignments & Licenses
Copyright
Copyright Litigation
Copyright Litigation
Covered Business Method (CBM)
Due Diligence
Global Portfolio Management
Inter Partes Review (IPR)
International Trade Commission (ITC) Disputes
IP Strategy
IP Transactions, Agreements & Venture Capital
Litigation
Opinions & Counseling
Patent Litigation
Patent Strategy & Prosecution
Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) Trials (Post Grant)
Patentability 
Post-Grant Review (PGR)
Registration
Trade Secret
Trade Secret & Employee Mobility Litigation
Trade Secret & Employee Mobility Litigation
Trademark & Brand Protection
Trademark Litigation & Unfair Competition
Trademark Litigation & Unfair Competition
Transactions
U.S. Patent Prosecution
Unfair Competition Litigation

Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference – C.D. Cal. Lawyer Representative

Local Rules Advisory Committee – C.D. Cal.

Federal Circuit Bar Association

Federal Bar Association

Association of Business Trial Lawyers

Orange County Bar Association

Orange County Coalition for Diversity in the Law

Hispanic Bar Association of Orange County

International Association for Cryptologic Research

By using this blog, you agree and understand that no information is being provided in the context of any attorney-client relationship. You further agree and understand that nothing herein is intended to be legal advice. This blog is solely informational in nature, and is not intended as, and should not be used as, a substitute for competent legal advice from a retained and licensed attorney in your state. Knobbe Martens LLP makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the information in this blog. Knobbe Martens LLP will not be liable for any injury or damages relating to your use of, or access to, any such information. Knobbe Martens LLP undertakes no obligation to correct or update information on this blog, which may be incorrect or become incorrect or out of date over time. Knobbe Martens LLP reserves the right to alter or delete content or information on the blog at any time. This blog contains links and references to other websites and publications that you may find of interest. Knobbe Martens LLP does not control, promote, endorse or otherwise have any affiliation with any other websites or publications unless those websites or publications expressly state such an affiliation. Knobbe Martens LLP further has no responsibility for, and makes no representations regarding, the content, accuracy or any other aspect of the information in such websites or publications.
close modal